Re: least connections first balancing

Hi Dan,

On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 10:42:37AM -0700, Dan Zubey wrote:
> Hey Willy.
>
> I've been analysing our setup here, and it looks like we *really* need
> the least connections first balancing asap, so much so that I'm being
> pushed to patch our proxy to use it, rather than wait for it to be
> released.

I've merged my trees in the code, it will soon be a lot easier to implement leastconn. I'm currently working full time on haproxy to merge dynamic weights, slowstart and graceful server shutdown. I have a short deadline for this (early december), but after that, it should be a matter of days to implement leastconn correctly on the same framework.

> I'm wondering if the version of the patch up on the website is the most
> recent version, and if it's that one I should apply.

This version will only work on an old 1.2. You can try to port it to a more recent 1.2 if you want, but you'll get a headache trying to port it to 1.3 :-)

Best regards,
Willy Received on 2007/11/19 18:31