Re: Haproxy & un-usual session tracking

From: Benoit <maverick#maverick.eu.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:44:25 +0100


>
> From: Aleksandar Lazic <al-haproxy#none.at
> <mailto:al-haproxy#none.at?Subject=Re:%20Haproxy%20&amp;%20un-usual%20session%20tracking>>
>
> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:14:37 +0100
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Son 25.11.2007 23:27, Benoit wrote:
> //Have you looked into the
> http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.3/doc/architecture.txt doc ;-)
>

Well yes, the point of the message is that i can't use this kind of method (cookie)
cause it won't have the effect i'm looking after.

> What happens if all backends send the same host-header?!
Well, the "Host" header isn't sent by a back-end, it's the virtualhost requested by the web browser.
In fact what i'm looking for is kinda the same thing done by the "balance uri" configuration, just i need to balance on the virtualhost part.
>
> /> Any hint ?/
>
> Maybe the '2.11) Application Cookies' can help?
>

Well no, as i said before i can't, it would need to make each back-end server aware of a global vhost/backend association table which is somewhat easier to do in the load-balancer

> It will help when you try to explain/declare what/which application
> server you have ;-)
>

I don't see how it could help, anyway this i'm not allowed to say (or maybe i'm too ashamed of, pick your choice :) )

> Cheers
>

Cheers too Received on 2007/11/26 21:44

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2007/11/26 22:30 CET