Re: Haproxy & un-usual session tracking

On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 10:08:04AM +0100, Benoit wrote:
> >>Still that's not really a problem since i could build some script which
> >>would do the job, but the idea was to get some
> >>automatic load-balancing to keep us from manualy doing the job.
> >>
> >
> >That's a boring way of doing it, let's stay away from this.
> >
> You read my mind ;)

Developping a solution knowing that people will not be able to use it "normally" is not really motivating. I'm particularly focused on how to make it fit concrete needs.

> That's kinda weird. I've used the small version (11501) two years ago
> with no big problems,
> in fact it was one of the only thing we didn't have to cary about ...

Interesting... Like most products in this category, I bet that precise versions and used features matter a lot.

> >I've put the same page here without the
> >javascript introduced by the google ads just in case it's the problem's
> >root :
> >
> > http://haproxy.1wt.eu/index2.html
> >
> >If that solves the problem, I'll have to speed up the removal of the
> >ads from those pages. This was an experiment I performed last year
> >but it takes as much time to rework the site as it took to build it
> >last. So eventhough those ads don't bring anything, as long as they
> >don't cost I have no incentive to work on removing them.
> >
> >Thanks for the info!
> >Willy
> >
> I'll let you know if that's better.

Thanks
Willy Received on 2007/11/28 22:39