On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> On Mit 26.12.2007 00:27, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
>>
>
> [snipp]
>
>> So IMHO there is no point in "parsing [haproxy.cfg:66]: 'option'
>> expects an option name.", but if you insist I can keep it
>> unchanged. ;)
>
> You are right ;-)
>
> I have not seen the full view, sorry for the rush.
No offence taken! :) I'm glad that someone checks my patches and it is possible to discuss all unclear parts.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki Received on 2007/12/26 01:27
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2007/12/26 01:30 CET