On Son 30.12.2007 16:36, Willy Tarreau wrote:
[snipp]
my run gives this:
tot=244359, min=86, avg=119.315918, max=153
Distribution: (#entries => #times)
Most frequent number of entries: 120 (80 times)
---
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
10 0
11 0
12 0
13 0
14 0
15 0
16 0
17 0
18 0
19 0
20 0
21 0
22 0
23 0
24 0
25 0
26 0
27 0
28 0
29 0
30 0
31 0
32 0
33 0
34 0
35 0
36 0
37 0
38 0
39 0
40 0
41 0
42 0
43 0
44 0
45 0
46 0
47 0
48 0
49 0
50 0
51 0
52 0
53 0
54 0
55 0
56 0
57 0
58 0
59 0
60 0
61 0
62 0
63 0
64 0
65 0
66 0
67 0
68 0
69 0
70 0
71 0
72 0
73 0
74 0
75 0
76 0
77 0
78 0
79 0
80 0
81 0
82 0
83 0
84 0
85 0
86 1
87 0
88 0
89 3
90 1
91 5
92 1
93 4
94 4
95 5
96 5
97 11
98 8
99 9
100 17
101 14
102 24
103 25
104 36
105 33
106 34
107 38
108 52
109 57
110 62
111 57
112 50
113 64
114 76
115 66
116 79
117 75
118 69
119 79
120 80
121 75
122 63
123 57
124 59
125 59
126 53
127 51
128 65
129 53
130 38
131 49
132 49
133 32
134 35
135 27
136 28
137 11
138 16
139 14
140 14
141 9
142 8
143 6
144 6
145 2
146 5
147 2
148 3
149 6
150 2
151 3
152 2
153 2
---
Hm, looks to me that the datas which I use are not good to hash:
I have some of:
http://ADDRESS|NAME/ http://ADDRESS|NAME/index.htm http://ADDRESS|NAME/OTHER_DIR/
If you want I can tell you where you can get this data ;-) Maybe we will find a solution in the next year ;-)
Cheers
Aleks Received on 2007/12/30 17:37
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2007/12/30 17:45 CET