Re: Stunnel & HAProxy

From: Aleksandar Lazic <al-haproxy#none.at>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 00:54:13 +0100


Hi,

On Don 31.01.2008 17:08, Jill Rochelle wrote:
>I am new to haproxy and stunnel and the ssl world. I'm trying to get
>stunnel to work with haproxy for load balancing https requests. In the
>haproxy documentation it says that the stunnel.conf should look like
>this

[snipp]

I'am sure you have not read the right sentence:

---http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.3/doc/architecture.txt

.
.



3.1. Alternate solution using Stunnel

When only SSL is required and cache is not needed, stunnel is a cheaper solution than Apache+mod_ssl. By default, stunnel does not process HTTP and does not add any X-Forwarded-For header, but there is a patch on the official haproxy site to provide this feature to recent stunnel versions.

.
.
.
---

Take a look there http://haproxy.1wt.eu/#down

Cheers

Aleks
Received on 2008/02/01 00:54

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2008/02/01 01:00 CET