RE: Stunnel & HAProxy

From: Jill Rochelle <jrochelle#digitalchalk.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:21:31 -0500

Thank you ... I totally missed that ... However, my next problem is that the patch is for 4.20 and I installed 4.21.

Is a patch for Stunnel 4.21 for the xforwardedfor ?

• Jill

-----Original Message-----
From: Aleksandar Lazic [mailto:al-haproxy#none.at] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 6:54 PM To: haproxy#formilux.org
Subject: Re: Stunnel & HAProxy

Hi,

On Don 31.01.2008 17:08, Jill Rochelle wrote:
>I am new to haproxy and stunnel and the ssl world. I'm trying to get
>stunnel to work with haproxy for load balancing https requests. In the
>haproxy documentation it says that the stunnel.conf should look like
>this

[snipp]

I'am sure you have not read the right sentence:

---http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.3/doc/architecture.txt

.
.

---

3.1. Alternate solution using Stunnel

---

When only SSL is required and cache is not needed, stunnel is a cheaper solution than Apache+mod_ssl. By default, stunnel does not process HTTP and does not add any X-Forwarded-For header, but there is a patch on the official
haproxy site to provide this feature to recent stunnel versions.

.
.
.

---

Take a look there http://haproxy.1wt.eu/#down

Cheers

Aleks

Received on 2008/02/01 04:21