Re: Changes in the check timeouts

On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Willy Tarreau wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 01:23:21PM +0100, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Krzysztof !
>> <CUT>
>>
>>> This would solve many complicated thoughts about how to set all those
>>> values, and bring a simple and functional method. Unless you come up
>>> with an alternative proposal or a big warning, I'm going to adjust the
>>> code that way this afternoon.
>>
>> Thanks, however I'm not able to find time to think of this this problem
>> right now as I only was able to (only briefly) read your mail. If you
>> could wait a day or two I'll be able to deal with it during the weekend.
>> If not - fine, please commit your changes.
>
> OK, I'm sorry for the lack of time to think. I'll do it today anyway at least
> to fix the regression, and we'll be able to discuss it (as well as any possible
> improvement) this weekend.

Please hold. I think I found the bug. My initial idea was to keep timeouts untouched if "timeout check" is not set. However, as I did most of the job traveling I was not able to test everyting carefully enough. I don't want to do the same mistake again - during next 5 hours I have two meetings so I'll send a (truly tested!) patch to fix the bug this evening.

Best regards,

                                 Krzysztof Olêdzki Received on 2008/02/15 14:45