From: <>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:03:47 +0100


I've seen, that there has alread been a discussion about http keepalive, but I'd like to start it again cause I think that it's a great feature. I'v tested haproxy and it works well. But if you have a page with tons of images, javascript and css it took some time till the browser has received all objects, cause for a every request a new handshake is necessary. I can see the effect on my apache. With enabled keepalive the pages are served in less time than without keepalive. I know keepalive will have some negative effects as non terminated connections blocking ports. What do you think about keepalive. I think that this feature would be a great enhancement for haproxy.

All the best

Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kann`s mit allen:
Received on 2008/03/04 17:03

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2008/03/04 17:15 CET