Quoting Alberto Giménez <lagimenez#gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 4:59 PM, <eneal#businessgrade.com> wrote:
>> mode that haproxy offers that's equivalent to ipvs direct routing. My real
>> servers are Windows 2003 boxes with the VIP bound to the loopback adapter.
>> Is this the equivalent of transparent mode?
>
> Hi!
>
> That has nothing to do to transparent mode AFAIK. Transparent mode
> means the load balancer will connect to the backend serves telling the
> client's IP instead his own. Also, you need to patch the kernel the
> proxy is running on, load the module that adds transparent proxying
> support and tweak haproxy's configuration (no unprivileged users, add
> "use clientsrc" option and so).
Thanks so much for the clarification. It's much appreciated.
> Furthermore, you need the servers for transparent proxying to work to
> GET ROUTED THROUGH the load balancer, so it's not at all as direct
> routing on LVS.
Yeah - This is not what I want to do. I want the real servers to
respond to the clients directly - as in what I can do with direct
routing and ipvs
>
> You don't need to bind the VIP on the servers. Just do it on the
> haproxy box and let it balance the connections to the servers' real
> IPs. What are you exactly trying to achieve?
Please see above
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> Alberto Giménez
>
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This communication may contain material protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Received on 2008/06/03 17:57
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2008/06/03 22:00 CEST