Re: what are "normal" ports to bind/connect to?

From: Jeffrey 'jf' Lim <jfs.world#gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:14:05 +0800


On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm#loadbalancer.org> wrote:
> Jan-Frode,
>
> Thats a tough one :-).
>
> 80 obviously
>
> 21/23/25/81/8080....
>

hm... ftp's tricky. If you want to include 21, then you might want to consider 20 as well.

> A clear error on start up and description of how to resolve would be
> useful I guess, but then I guess haproxy wouldn't know it was being
> blocked by selinux policy?
>

nope... Unless there were some kind of a "standard" way to inform an application (in which case, of course, the app would have to be programmed for that).

-jf (too, ha)

--
In the meantime, here is your PSA:
"It's so hard to write a graphics driver that open-sourcing it would not help."
    -- Andrew Fear, Software Product Manager, NVIDIA Corporation
http://kerneltrap.org/node/7228
Received on 2009/04/22 12:14

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2009/04/22 12:15 CEST