Re: Using HAProxy In Place of WCCP

On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:58:32 -0500, "John Lauro" <john.lauro#covenanteyes.com> wrote:
> I see two potential issues (which may or may not be important for
> you).
>
>
>
> 1. Non http 1.1 clients may have trouble (ie: they don't send
> the host on the URL request, or if they are not really http but using
> port 80).

Yeah, for that to work you would have to use TCP mode so no tricks like hashing by URL to improve cache hit rate  

> 2. Back tracking if you get a complaint from some website (ie:
> RIAA complaint) is going to be near impossible of determining who
> accessed whatever.

Wouldn't loggin in haproxy solve that ?

Regards
Mariusz