Re: Keepalives and Errors

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 01:51:30PM -0500, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Willy Tarreau <w#1wt.eu> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I suspect that in fact you're diverting the 503 to use an errorfile
> > directive to return some specific data. This won't be needed anymore
> > once we implement the "return" directive to return raw messages or
> > files, so I'd not want to complexify the error handling a lot just
> > for some tricks.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Willy
> >
>
> Willy,
>
> Do you have any kind of timeline or plan for when the return directive
> will be implemented? That sounds like it could be really useful for
> me!

I understand but I have no ETA. It could be quickly done, but if we consider all the variants we talked about, it can take a bit more time. So no, I have no idea. Also depending on whether we'd like to support keep-alive or not, it can considerably complicate it.

Regards,
Willy Received on 2010/01/28 06:25