Hypermail

From: Joe Williams <joe#joetify.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:32:06 -0700

Awesome, thanks Willy. I look forward to testing it out.

-Joe

On Oct 8, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:

> Hi Joe,
>
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 07:37:20AM -0700, Joe Williams wrote:
> (...)

>>> Thus we could have :
>>> 
>>> 	timeout server		5m
>>> 	timeout dead-server	10s
>>> 
>>> I'm not saying it would be easier (it would not in my opinion), but it would
>>> provide much cleaner results. What do you think ?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Willy,
>> 
>> I think that should work, my issue is definitely long polling requests as you suggested. The only thing in addition to this would be to retry the request but failing faster might be good enough for now. As I mentioned in my second email doing ACL based timeouts would also work for me since I know which urls I expect to take a long time to return.

>
> OK. Concerning the ACL-based timeouts, I have added that to the 1.5 roadmap,
> because I think that it's not too hard to do if we only support changing the
> server timeout (others are useless in this case).
>
> Cheers,
> Willy
>
>

Name: Joseph A. Williams
Email: joe#joetify.com
Blog: http://www.joeandmotorboat.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/williamsjoe Received on 2010/10/08 20:32

Re: kill existing connections immediately on failed health check