RE: Haproxy timing issues

From: Erik Torlen <erik.torlen#apicasystem.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 22:55:59 +0000


Okey, good to know Vincent.
Do you know the memory impact using 10k, 20k etc?

/E

-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent Bernat [mailto:bernat#luffy.cx] Sent: den 2 november 2011 15:40
To: Erik Torlen
Cc: Lukas Tribus; haproxy#formilux.org
Subject: Re: Haproxy timing issues

OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 02 novembre 2011, vers 21:13, Erik Torlen <erik.torlen#apicasystem.com> disait :

> /usr/local/bin/stud -b 127.0.0.1 85 -f *,443 --ssl -B 1000 -n 2 -C
> 40000 -u stud -r /home/stud --write-proxy /usr/share/ssl-cert/
> cert.pem
 

> I have tried stud using 10k of shared cache which gave me worse
> performance. Has anyone tried stud with different sizes of the shared
> session cache?

It depends on the profile of your traffic. With about 4000 conn/s and 1000 new client/s, a cache of 20k seems to provide the best performance. Increasing it does not hinder the performance. However, the benchmark was a bit artificial because each client will do 4 conn and will disappear forever.
--
Vincent Bernat ☯ http://vincent.bernat.im

# Okay, what on Earth is this one supposed to be used for?

        2.4.0 linux/drivers/char/cp437.uni Received on 2011/11/02 23:55

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2011/11/03 00:00 CET