Re: [PATCH] : rework checks handling

From: Krzysztof Oledzki <>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:40:27 +0100 (CET)

On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Willy Tarreau wrote:

> Krzysztof,
> That's excellent work, thank you! I'm going to merge after a few basic
> checks here since you said you could not. But I'm confident, code looks
> OK.

OK, thank you.

> I just have one comment about the doc. While I don't care about the
> 80 col limit in the code, this time I *do* really want to ensure that
> we never cross this limit. That way we know we can print the doc using
> a2ps or things like this without missing even one char. I've noticed
> one or two long lines, I'll merge your patch and quickly adjust the
> doc in the next patch.
> At first glance, here are the few victims which will have their tail cut :
>> + See also: "timeout connect", "timeout queue", "timeout server", "timeout tarpit".
>> + See also: "timeout check", "timeout queue", "timeout server", "timeout tarpit" "contimeout".
>> + Just as with every other time-based parameter, they can be entered in any other


Best regards,

                                         Krzysztof Olędzki Received on 2008/01/22 00:40

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2008/01/22 00:45 CET