Re: [PATCH] : rework checks handling

From: Willy Tarreau <w#1wt.eu>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:13:04 +0100


Applied too.

Thanks,
Willy

On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 12:40:27AM +0100, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> >Krzysztof,
> >
> >That's excellent work, thank you! I'm going to merge after a few basic
> >checks here since you said you could not. But I'm confident, code looks
> >OK.
> OK, thank you.
>
> >I just have one comment about the doc. While I don't care about the
> >80 col limit in the code, this time I *do* really want to ensure that
> >we never cross this limit. That way we know we can print the doc using
> >a2ps or things like this without missing even one char. I've noticed
> >one or two long lines, I'll merge your patch and quickly adjust the
> >doc in the next patch.
> >
> >At first glance, here are the few victims which will have their tail cut :
> >
> >>+ See also: "timeout connect", "timeout queue", "timeout server",
> >>"timeout tarpit".
> >>+ See also: "timeout check", "timeout queue", "timeout server", "timeout
> >>tarpit" "contimeout".
> >>+ Just as with every other time-based parameter, they can be entered in
> >>any other
>
> Fine.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Krzysztof Ol?dzki
Received on 2008/01/22 14:13

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2008/01/22 14:45 CET