On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 05:35:52AM +0100, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >>BTW: there is one more unhandled patch: "Prevent redispatcher from
> >>selecting the same server, version #3". ;)
> >OK, I had some confusion initially about this one because I thought it
> >changed the behaviour to what you described in the second part of the
> >changelog, which it apparently does not. I'll merge it.
> There are two different patches I'm afraid you have possibly mistaken:
> - "Don't increment server connections too much + fix retries"
> - "Prevent redispatcher from selecting the same server, version #3"
> The "second part of the changelog" comment applies to the fist one, not
> the one I mentioned above.
> Sorry for the confusion, it seems I send too many patches on once.
No, that's fine. The only thing to care about is not to speak about things unrelated to the patch in its accompanying changelog. Pure discussion about future changs should be either in a separate mail or before the git patch in the mail so that I can clearly differentiate it from the patch description itself.
Also, when you send multiple patches in a short time, do not hesitate to tell me if one of them is particularly important for you, because you need it merged first to advance, or it's an awful bug, etc... While I don't always have enough time to review and merge all patches at once, I certainly can focus on a specific one.
Willy Received on 2008/03/01 06:47
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2008/03/01 07:00 CET