On Sat, 1 Mar 2008, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 05:35:52AM +0100, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
>> >> >> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Willy Tarreau wrote: >> >> <CUT> >>>> BTW: there is one more unhandled patch: "Prevent redispatcher from >>>> selecting the same server, version #3". ;) >>> >>> OK, I had some confusion initially about this one because I thought it >>> changed the behaviour to what you described in the second part of the >>> changelog, which it apparently does not. I'll merge it. >> >> There are two different patches I'm afraid you have possibly mistaken: >> - "Don't increment server connections too much + fix retries" >> - "Prevent redispatcher from selecting the same server, version #3" >> >> The "second part of the changelog" comment applies to the fist one, not >> the one I mentioned above. >
> >> Sorry for the confusion, it seems I send too many patches on once. >
I'll do my best. ;)
> Also, when you send multiple patches in a short time, do not hesitate
> to tell me if one of them is particularly important for you, because
> you need it merged first to advance, or it's an awful bug, etc... While
> I don't always have enough time to review and merge all patches at once,
> I certainly can focus on a specific one.
OK. However, they are not particularly important just noted that one of my patches is still unreviewed and possibly overlooked.
Krzysztof Olędzki Received on 2008/03/02 03:03
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2008/03/02 03:15 CET