Patrick Viet wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Michael Rennt <m.rennt#gmx.net> wrote:
>> I see that the server identifier is stored inside the cookies. This is pretty >> good, as it keeps stickyness even when there's a failover to another equally >> configured loadbalancer.
>> The only question left for now: How is all the hashing and distribution implemented? >> >> I see that the source IP (or whatever other parameter) is hashed and divided by >> the total weight of all servers. But what if a new server is added? >> Won't the stickiness be completely different after that, messing up any existing >> stickiness?
This is what I did yesterday before sending the mail. I just didn't test source persistence together with cookie persistence.
I see that y'all rather use the source option in combination with a persistency cookie.
This is the background why I'm afraid that a new server will mess up the stickyness.
Michael Received on 2008/03/13 11:21
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2008/03/13 11:30 CET