Sorry to reply to myself (bad netiquette and all), but I've just
spotted the later mail from Willy with regards to issues with the
patch - so obviously I'll keep an eye out for that issue being
resolved, and take it from there.
Thanks guys.
Chris
Quoting chris#sargy.co.uk:
> Hi,
>
> Just as an addition to this - is this (the HTTP-ECV patch) going to
> make it into the main haproxy release at any point?
>
> Cheers
> Chris
>
>
> Quoting Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm#loadbalancer.org>:
>
>> Chris,
>>
>> Someone wrote a patch, search the archives for
>> HTTP-ECV(Extended Content Verification) monitor
>>
>>
>>
>> 2009/6/18 <chris#sargy.co.uk>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been reading the documentation for haproxy, and I don't think
>>> that the following option is available, but would just like to get
>>> confirmation:
>>>
>>> I have 2 servers, and would like to use the second server as a
>>> backup for failover purposes rather than for loadbalancing
>>> purposes. In order to facilitate this we want to parse the output
>>> of a page and check for a specific string in the output of the
>>> page, rather than the HTTP response generated by the page.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Malcolm Turnbull.
>>
>> Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
>> Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
>> http://www.loadbalancer.org/
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2009/06/26 12:45 CEST