Re: haproxy and amazon

From: Willy Tarreau <w#1wt.eu>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 21:01:51 +0200


Hi Julien,

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 07:57:00AM -0400, Julien Vehent wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:16:59 +0200, Baptiste wrote:
> >Hi gents,
> >
> >I'm looking for people who use haproxy on an amazon server.
> >I'm more interested by the number of hit/s you could get.
> >
>
> Compared to our multi-tomcat-jboss-ultra-threaded-and-locked
> application (that doesn't seem to like EC2 too much), Haproxy is running
> like a charm up there.
> As of hit/s, well, I've never managed to saturate haproxy before
> saturating everything else in the chain, so I can't tell you.
>
> My (limited) experience of EC2 showed me that the bottleneck are
> essentially a limited number of CPU (although quite beefy and not
> applicable to haproxy), the EBS storage (also not applicable) and, if
> you're not in a VPC, the network.
> If you have issues with the latest, try running in a VPC, it seems that
> we are reaching between 1 and 1.5 gbps between instances in that env.

From what I observed a few years ago, the limiting factor was not much the data rate but the packet rate. At that time it was hard, maybe impossible, to get more than 4-6k connections per second.

It is possible that things have improved a bit since though. Still that's very low compared to real hardware, as a 7-Watt Atom CPU performs equally.

Cheers,
Willy Received on 2011/06/25 21:01

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2011/06/25 21:15 CEST