Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:05:22PM +0200, Patrick Viet wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Willy Tarreau <w#1wt.eu> wrote: >> >> >>> I don't see your point. If a browser has to send 60 requests on a page, it >>> only depends on the application, the LB cannot lower that number. Maybe >>> you should install a reverse cache to relieve your servers (anyone tried >>> varnish ?). >>> >>> >>> >> I have the most horrible experience with varnish. >> Not only it has no proper documentation, but it also crashes in a completely >> random way (answers half of the requests), just like BIND as a cache >> nameserver in a high volume setup does... >> >> I lost a customer over using varnish... And nearly lost another one. >> >
>> Patrick >> >
FWIW, I've been using varnish for months on FreeBSD 7.0/amd64 without any significant problems.
Hugo Received on 2008/04/18 01:45
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2008/04/18 02:00 CEST