Re: Expected haproxy performance inside a VMWare instance

From: lists <>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:35:49 +0100


Just did a test on LVS and yes 100,000 connections in 26second with 99% system CPU
So about 4 times quicker, but still very high CPU. The only thing that worried me was that HaProxy overloads the CPU at a very low number of connections.
Still lots of people still want to buy it :-). so we will plow ahead with slightly inappropriate technology.

Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Malcolm, I suspect that you observe the same high CPU usage with LVS.
> Regards,
> Willy
Received on 2008/07/15 12:35

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2008/07/15 12:45 CEST