WT> I think it can be useful, indeed, especially for people already dealing WT> with multi-level x-forwarded-for entries, and those expecting to get WT> x-clientip or things like this.
Yup, I needed X-Cluster-Client-IP: myself.
WT> Could you please repost your patch in "diff -u" format ? WT> Also, ensure that it's properly formatted, I see spaces WT> everywhere at the beginning of lines, so I suspect that WT> your mail agent has mangled it (use plain text attachment WT> if you want)
That's probably a bit of both - it was a 'quick' patch using a lot of cut'n'paste from other sections of code, with no real care for neatness. I was looking for commentary and then would clean it up if wanted.
So I'll clean and re-diff it now.
WT> . Last request : please update the doc entry WT> when adding a feature. Don't spend too much time on it, WT> but I really expect people who contribute features to add WT> a few words suggesting a typical usage of such features.
No problem. I did most of it already at the top of the email, so adding a bit more and diffing it into the documentation isn't an issue.
--Received on 2008/07/31 15:50
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2008/07/31 16:01 CEST